House Republicans unveil sweeping $880 billion budget cuts to Medicaid, Medicare, and food stamps as states brace for dramatic restructuring of federal funding and responsibilities.
At a Glance
- Speaker Mike Johnson’s budget proposal includes $880 billion in cuts over 10 years to programs under the Energy and Commerce Committee, primarily affecting Medicare and Medicaid
- States that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act will face significant financial adjustments
- Republicans claim cuts target waste, fraud, and abuse while preserving services for those in need
- Democrats, including New York Governor Kathy Hochul, warn the changes will devastate essential services
- The bill also proposes shifting SNAP (food stamp) responsibilities to states
States Facing Major Financial Restructuring
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson is advancing a budget reconciliation bill that would dramatically restructure federal funding for healthcare and nutrition assistance programs. The proposal includes an estimated $880 billion in cuts over 10 years to programs under the Energy and Commerce Committee, primarily targeting Medicaid and Medicare. Johnson stated that states will need to adjust to these proposed reforms, especially those that expanded Medicaid coverage under the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare.
Republican leaders maintain that substantial savings can be achieved by eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse in these programs. However, they acknowledge that significant program restructuring will be necessary, including shifting more financial responsibilities to state governments. Energy and Commerce Chairman Brett Guthrie is specifically addressing challenges related to states that expanded Medicaid, as these states would face the most dramatic funding adjustments.
Potential Medicaid Funding Caps
A key element of the Republican budget proposal involves potentially capping or reducing federal Medicaid payments to states. Congressional discussions include changing how the federal government funds Medicaid, which could include implementing per-capita caps or block grants. These changes would fundamentally alter the financial partnership between federal and state governments that has existed since Medicaid’s inception in 1965, potentially limiting federal financial responsibility while increasing state obligations.
This restructuring poses significant challenges for state budget planning. For example, New York recently approved a $254 billion budget that increases Medicaid spending without accounting for potential federal funding reductions. Governor Kathy Hochul and state Democratic leadership may need to reconvene in a special session to readjust their budget once the federal changes are finalized. The Republican proposal’s impact would be particularly pronounced in states with expanded Medicaid programs.
— Bee 🐝 (@bee_human_) February 13, 2025
SNAP Program Restructuring
Beyond healthcare, the Republican budget proposal also targets the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), commonly known as food stamps. The plan would shift more SNAP funding responsibilities to states, potentially changing how these essential nutrition benefits are administered and funded. This represents another significant area where state governments would need to absorb additional costs or reduce services in response to decreased federal support.
Speaker Johnson has defended the plan against Democrat criticisms, insisting that the changes will not eliminate needed services. “I’m telling you those things are not true,” Johnson stated, referring to Democrat claims about Medicaid cuts. “We’re going to preserve Medicaid. We want to make sure that those who are truly in need, truly disadvantaged, truly disabled, have their needs met.” He emphasized that states would need to adjust to the new funding structures but did not specify how they would maintain service levels with reduced federal support.
Legislative Timeline
Johnson has announced an ambitious timeline for passing what he calls “one big, beautiful bill” before Memorial Day. The proposal combines major spending cuts with other Republican priorities that align with former President Trump’s agenda. The reconciliation process being used requires only a simple majority in the Senate, bypassing the typical 60-vote threshold needed to overcome a filibuster.
The rapid timeline has drawn criticism from Democrats who argue that such substantial changes to essential safety net programs deserve more thorough deliberation. With Republicans holding a narrow House majority, Johnson can afford to lose only a few votes, making the path to passage challenging. The bill represents one of the most significant attempts to restructure federal entitlement programs in decades, potentially reshaping the relationship between federal and state governments in providing essential services to millions of Americans.
