Navy Vet Just SUED CNN – For A BILLION Dollars

A Navy veteran is taking CNN to court, seeking $1 billion in damages for what he claims was a defamatory report that devastated his life and career.

At a Glance

  • Navy veteran Zachary Young files $1 billion defamation lawsuit against CNN
  • Young alleges CNN’s report led to job loss and inability to find new employment
  • CNN segment accused Young of using an illegal “black market” in Afghanistan evacuations
  • Young claims severe emotional and financial distress resulting from the report
  • CNN later removed “black market” term but allegedly issued no apology

Veteran’s Reputation Under Fire

In a bold move that challenges the integrity of mainstream media reporting, Navy veteran Zachary Young has initiated a $1 billion defamation lawsuit against CNN. The suit stems from a November 11, 2021 segment that Young claims misrepresented his involvement in evacuation efforts from Afghanistan during the chaotic Taliban takeover. According to the lawsuit, CNN’s portrayal of Young as a profiteer engaging in illegal activities has had devastating consequences on his personal and professional life.

The controversial report, hosted by CNN anchor Jake Tapper, allegedly accused Young of utilizing an illegal “black market” to evacuate individuals from Afghanistan. This characterization, Young asserts, is not only false but has inflicted severe damage to his reputation and livelihood. The aftermath of the segment reportedly led to the termination of Young’s employment and has prevented him from securing work opportunities.

The Fallout: Career and Personal Impact

Young’s legal claim highlights the profound impact the CNN report has had on his life. Shortly after the segment aired, his employment with Amentum ended abruptly, despite indications that his contract was set to be renewed. This sudden loss of income has created significant financial hardship for Young, who supports his disabled 75-year-old mother.

The veteran’s distress extends beyond financial concerns. Young testified that he has experienced severe emotional trauma, including panic attacks and fears of potential legal repercussions stemming from CNN’s portrayal. The backlash on social media following the report has further compounded his anguish, leaving him unable to work or earn money since the segment aired.

CNN’s Response and Legal Battle

In response to the growing controversy, CNN reportedly removed the term “black market” from the online version of the segment. However, Young contends that no formal apology was issued, leaving the damage to his reputation unaddressed. The lawsuit also alleges that CNN misled Young about the nature of their reporting and fabricated a scene of reaching out to him for comment.

Young’s legal team argues that CNN’s actions were not only negligent but potentially malicious, given that Young had warned the network about potential legal consequences if they proceeded with what he believed was inaccurate reporting.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR